ep4 receptor antagonist 1 (MedChemExpress)
Structured Review

Ep4 Receptor Antagonist 1, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 4 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ep4 receptor antagonist 1/product/MedChemExpress
Average 94 stars, based on 4 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "EBV promotes alveolar trabecula resorption via extracellular vesicle remodeling by group IIA secreted phospholipase A 2"
Article Title: EBV promotes alveolar trabecula resorption via extracellular vesicle remodeling by group IIA secreted phospholipase A 2
Journal: Journal of Lipid Research
doi: 10.1016/j.jlr.2026.101014
Figure Legend Snippet: sPLA 2 -IIA hydrolyzes EV phospholipids and promotes bone resorption through LPAR1 and EP4 receptor. A: Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry of lipids from Akata LCL EVs after treatment with sPLA 2 -IIA (n = 3). Whole lipids were extracted, and the levels of both lysophospholipids and polyunsaturated fatty acids were analyzed. Relative values are shown. Values are presented as the mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined using student’s t test: ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ P < 0.001. B: THP-1 cells were cultured with Akata LCL EVs treated with or without sPLA 2 -IIA for 24 h. Prior to administration, THP-1 cells were pretreated with or without 10 μM AM966 or 1 μM EP4 receptor antagonist 1. C: Representative images of H&E staining, immunostaining of CTSK, and TRAP staining of the mouse maxillary palatal region. PBS, sPLA 2 -IIA, Akata LCL EVs, and sPLA 2 -IIA-treated Akata LCL EVs were injected into the mandibular incisor region. EVs are treated with sPLA 2 -IIA and varespladib prior to injection. Capitals indicate T: tooth, P: periodontal ligament, and B: bone region. A representative example is shown from the analysis of three mice. D: Quantification of CTSK and TRAP staining in the tissue shown in C (n = 3 mice per group). Values in B and D are presented as the mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using student’s t test: ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ P < 0.001.
Techniques Used: Mass Spectrometry, Cell Culture, Staining, Immunostaining, Injection
